Ok, she is not okay with it, but she does not like the idea of having them PTS, what she meant was "if you are going to kill them (by putting them to sleep) then allow another animal to eat afterwards" I am not trying to start a controversy, but an example would be when we went to the zoo, we got to see the "big cat feeding" and they were eating horse. They did not kill the horse to feed the cats, the horse died of natural causes, so instead of putting it in the ground for bugs to eat, they fed the cats with it. Circle of life. I have gotten to know Kathleen quite well over these past few weeks, and like I said, she does NOT want them to end up dying either way. But you cannot save them all, 80% of those babies were though (even though 24% was me LOL).
Like I said, I do NOT want to start a controversy, just trying to clear things up, and stand up for someone who is unable to do so herself. And since she works there, she can make sure they do not end up in the feeder tank, and she can chat with people who may buy them. She has done everything she could, if she could keep them she would, but her mother will not allow it, so what more can she do? As it is, her mother keeps extending the cut off date to allow her more time to find homes, and if it was meant to be, it would have happened....she has posted everywhere she could think of, and I have harassed everyone I could think of......